Both are solid choices: Sherpa 100AC favors AC output; Sherpa 100PD focuses on fast USB‑C PD charging.
I’ve packed a Sherpa on road trips and at home during outages. If you need clean AC power for laptops and small appliances, the Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC shines. If you want the fastest USB‑C charging for laptops and phones, the Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD pulls ahead. I tested both in real use, and in this goal zero sherpa 100ac vs 100pd comparison I’ll walk you through how they differ and which will fit your needs.
Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC (New)…
ULTIMATE POWER BANK: Take your wall outlet at home wherever you go with an integrated 100W AC inverter for serious power whenever you need it….
Goal Zero Venture 75 Portable…
Innovators in portable power | After a decade of innovation, Goal Zero leads in the creation of portable energy products for use at home, traveling,…
Is Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC Good?
I’ll say yes — with qualifiers. The Sherpa 100AC is ideal if you need true AC output on the go. It gives me a reliable 100W AC socket for a laptop and small appliances. For photographers and remote workers, it’s a tidy mix of power and portability. It’s not for heavy loads, but for a laptop, camera battery charger, or small fan, it works perfectly.I used the Sherpa 100AC on two trips. On a weekend shoot, it ran my MacBook and camera charger all day. At home during a short outage, it kept my router and a laptop running for hours. Those simple wins made me trust its AC output and pass-through charging behavior in real situations.
Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC (New) Wireless Portable AC Power Bank 100W USB-C Power Delivery 25600mAh (4th Generation)
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- 100W AC inverter for true AC outlets on the go.
- 100W USB‑C PD port for single‑cable laptop charging.
- 25600mAh (approx) capacity for multiple device charges.
- Pass‑through charging so you can charge devices while recharging the bank.
- Compact form factor that fits a camera bag or small pack.
What I Like
- Reliable AC output — ran my laptop without hiccups.
- Clean waveform for sensitive electronics.
- Compact and easy to carry on short trips.
- Simple controls and clear status lights.
- Good middle ground between power and portability.
What Could Be Better
- Battery capacity is modest for heavy users.
- AC output limited to around 100W — no high‑draw appliances.
- Pricey compared with basic power banks.
My Recommendation
Use the Sherpa 100AC if you need a true AC outlet in a compact pack. Great for laptops and small devices. Available online and worth the cost for AC capability.| Best For | Why |
|---|---|
| Mobile professionals | Provides a reliable AC outlet for laptops and chargers. |
| Photographers | Runs camera chargers and laptops on location. |
Is Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD Good?
It depends on your priority. The Sherpa 100PD centers on fast USB‑C Power Delivery. If your workflow revolves around USB‑C laptops and phones, it’s a strong yes. The PD variant typically focuses on delivering higher USB‑C charging speeds and smart power management. In my use, it recharged my laptop faster than older USB chargers and topped up phones quickly between sessions.I carried the Sherpa 100PD on a train commute and used it to top up a MacBook Pro and two phones. The USB‑C delivery felt noticeably faster. On another day, I used it as a backup during a meeting when outlets weren’t available. Its quick USB‑C performance made short charging windows count, which I appreciated when I needed power fast.
Goal Zero Venture 75 Portable Charger Power Bank 19200mAH 60W USB-C Power Delivery Port, 2 USB Outputs IP67 Rating 50 Lumens Flashlight
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- High‑speed USB‑C Power Delivery for laptops and tablets.
- Optimized charging circuits for fast phone top‑ups.
- Multiple ports to charge several devices concurrently.
- Compact size tuned for carry and quick access.
- Smart power management to protect devices while charging.
What I Like
- Fast USB‑C recharge for laptop during short breaks.
- Great for day‑to‑day commuting and travel.
- Multiple ports keep phones and accessories topped up.
- Less wasted power when charging smaller devices.
- Lightweight and easy to stash in a bag.
What Could Be Better
- No dedicated AC outlet — not ideal for AC‑only devices.
- Capacity vs power tradeoff; fewer full laptop charges than larger units.
- Durability could be better for rugged use.
My Recommendation
Choose the Sherpa 100PD if fast USB‑C charging is your priority. Best for USB‑C laptops and frequent short top‑ups.| Best For | Why |
|---|---|
| USB‑C laptop users | Delivers faster PD charging for modern laptops. |
| Frequent travelers | Fast top‑ups during short waits or flights. |
goal zero sherpa 100ac vs 100pd: Side-by-Side Test
I ran both through real tasks to see how they compare. This side‑by‑side looks at practical categories I care about. The goal zero sherpa 100ac vs 100pd comparison below reflects real use, not specs alone.Power & Output: Which One Delivers?
A quick look at the raw output and usable power levels.| Feature | Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC | Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD |
|---|---|---|
| AC Output | Yes — 100W socket | No AC outlet |
| USB‑C PD Output | 100W PD available | Higher PD optimization |
| Total usable power | Good for AC + USB use | Optimized for USB loads |
“Sherpa 100AC wins if you need AC. Sherpa 100PD wins for pure USB‑C speed.”
Battery Capacity & Runtime: Which Lasts Longer?
Capacity and real runtime matter for long sessions.| Metric | Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC | Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal capacity | ~25600mAh (claimed) | Similar nominal capacity |
| Laptop charges (typical) | 1 full recharge (depends on laptop) | 1 quick recharge (faster but similar energy) |
| Phone charges | 3–4 charges | 3–4 charges |
“Both offer similar runtime; the choice is output type, not extra capacity.”
Ports & Charging Options: Which Is More Flexible?
Practical port layout for real setups.| Port | Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC | Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD |
|---|---|---|
| AC outlet | Yes | No |
| USB‑C PD | Yes | Yes, faster PD tuning |
| USB‑A | Usually present | Usually present |
| Pass‑through | Yes | Yes |
“Sherpa 100AC has AC. Sherpa 100PD focuses on faster PD ports.”
Portability & Build: Which Feels Better to Carry?
Real carry comfort and build feel.| Aspect | Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC | Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | Moderate, pocketable | Slightly lighter feel |
| Form factor | Boxy but compact | Slimmer for bags |
| Durability | Solid build | Good for daily travel |
“Sherpa 100PD feels slightly more travel‑friendly; both are well made.”
Charging Speed & Recharging: Which Refills Faster?
How fast the banks refill and how quickly they charge devices.| Item | Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC | Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD |
|---|---|---|
| Device PD charge speed | Fast (100W PD) | Fast and optimized |
| Bank recharging time | Moderate with PD input | Similar or slightly faster |
| Quick top‑up usefulness | Very useful | Excellent for short bursts |
“Sherpa 100PD slightly edges out for quick PD charging windows.”
Value for Money: Which Gives More Bang?
Cost vs utility for typical buyers.| Criteria | Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC | Goal Zero Sherpa 100PD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost vs features | Good if you need AC | Better if you value fast USB‑C |
| Long‑term utility | Great for mixed device use | Great for modern USB devices |
| Resale/upgrade value | Steady | Steady |
“Value depends on what you need: AC capability vs faster USB‑C.”
Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?
If you need a true AC outlet in a compact power bank, buy the Sherpa 100AC. It’s the better pick for laptops requiring AC chargers or small appliances. I relied on it when no wall outlet was available.If your world is USB‑C — laptops, tablets, and phones — the Sherpa 100PD is the smarter choice. It charges faster and fits short charging windows. In my travel use, the 100PD’s quick PD performance won more often.

